Management limitations of closed architectures of automated process control systems in the digital transformation of industrial enterprises operating critical information infrastructure
https://doi.org/10.24182/2073-9885-2026-19-3-38-51
Abstract
The article examines the problem of managerial limitations caused by closed architectures of automated process control systems in the digital transformation of industrial enterprises operating critical information infrastructure. It is argued that modern automated process control systems should be considered not only as engineering systems for technological process control, but also as elements of the enterprise production and management circuit, providing data collection, monitoring, control actions and an information basis for managerial decision–making. The article shows that closed APCS architecture limits an enterprise’s ability to implement digital transformation due to vendor dependence, closed interfaces, low compatibility of components, high costs of system changes, difficulties in integration with corporate information systems and barriers to import substitution. The methodological basis of the study includes systemic, process, comparative and classification approaches. The scientific novelty of the article lies in clarifying the content of closed APCS architecture as a managerial barrier to digital transformation and in developing a classification of its limitations into five groups: architectural and technological, economic, organizational and managerial, integration–related, and regulatory–risk limitations. It is concluded that for enterprises operating critical information infrastructure, closed APCS architecture is of particular importance, since its limitations affect not only economic efficiency, but also the stability of critical processes, technological independence and the security of information interaction. The practical significance of the study lies in the possibility of using the proposed classification to justify the transition to more flexible, interoperable and open architectural solutions.
About the Authors
V. I. KhabarovRussian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Prof.
Moscow
A. Ya. Kravtsov
Russian Federation
Postraduate student
Moscow
References
1. Shekshnya S.V., Kravchenko K.A. Five lessons of digital transformation from CEOs of large companies. Russian Journal of Management. 2024. Vol. 22. No. 3. Pp. 602–620. DOI: 10.21638/spbu18.2024.310.
2. Germanchuk A.N., Komarnitskaya E.V. Business models of retail trade organizations: innovative opportunities for digital transformation (on the example of the DPR). Russian Journal of Management. 2025. Vol. 23. No. 3. Pp. 481–505.
3. Bogolyubova V.S., Fedorov S.I. Import substitution in the Russian market of database management systems: institutional aspects. Russian Journal of Management. 2025. Vol. 23. No. 4. Pp. 568–589.
4. Volkov A.V. Import substitution in the IT sphere of the Russian Federation: strategies, mechanisms and prospects of digital transformation. Bulletin of the Academy of Knowledge. 2025. № 2(67).
5. Kobzev V.V., Babkin A.V., Skorobogatov A. S. Digital transformation of industrial enterprises in a new reality. Economy. 2022. Vol. 15. No. 5. Pp. 7–27. DOI: 10.18721/JE.15501.
6. Gladilin A.K. Features of digitalization of defense industry enterprises. Bulletin of Eurasian Science. 2024. Vol. 16. No. s5.
7. Tyukavkin N.M. Development of the interoperability of automation processes of cyberphysical industrial systems in the context of digitalization. Bulletin of the Samara University. Economics and management. 2025. Vol. 16. No. 3. Pp. 206–213. DOI: 10.18287/2542-0461-2025-16-3-206-213.
8. Stepanov E.V. Digital transformation of industrial enterprises based on intelligent solutions of the «Industry 4.0» concept. Bulletin of Samara University. Economics and management. 2022. Vol. 13. No. 1. Pp. 49–55. DOI: 10.18287/2542-0461-2022-13-1-49-55.
9. Karlik A.E., Platonov V.V., Krechko S.A. Organizational support for the digital transformation of cooperative networks and the introduction of cybersocial systems. Scientific and Technical Bulletin of St. Petersburg State University. Economic sciences. 2019. Vol. 12. No. 5. Pp. 9–22. DOI: 10.18721/JE.12501.
10. Rodionova V.N., Antonov I.S. Multicriteria analysis and numerical solutions for increasing the competitiveness of enterprises in Industry 5.0. Economy. 2024. Vol. 17. No. 5. Pp. 32–44. DOI: 10.18721/JE.17502.
11. Ponomarenko E.V. Technological sovereignty of Russia: issues of theory and practice. Scientific Papers of the Free Economic Society of Russia. 2024. № 4.
12. Bylkova A.A., Shumeyko L.D., Bashkirova O.V. Analysis of global trends in the development of IT infrastructure and their impact on Russia. Bulletin of the Academy of Knowledge. 2025. No. 2(67). Pp. 159–161.
13. Mukhamadiyarova A.K., Abramova S.R., Rednikov D.V. The impact of digitalization on the economic security of the state through the assessment of benefits and costs. Discussion. 2025. No. 7(140). Pp. 140 145. DOI: 10.46320/2077-7639-2025-7-140-140-145.
14. Ignatov D.A. Digital transformation of domestic fuel and energy complex enterprises in the context of import substitution and outflow of foreign capital. Industry: economics, management, technology. 2024. Vol. 3. No. 1. Pp. 40–49.
15. Sharipov F.F., Xu Man. Theoretical aspects of digitalization of production processes. Entrepreneur’s Guide. 2023. Vol. 16. No. 4. Pp. 43–50. DOI: 10.24182/2073-9885-2023-16-4-43-50.
16. Trofimov S.V. Application of automation to increase productivity of business processes. Entrepreneur’s Guide. 2025. Vol. 18. No. 2. Pp. 32–39. DOI: 10.24182/2073-9885-2025-18-2-32-39.
17. Federal Law No. 187FZ dated July 26, 2017 «On the Security of the Critical Information Infrastructure of the Russian Federation».
18. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation dated 08.02.2018 No. 127 «On Approval of the Rules for Categorizing Objects of the Critical Information Infrastructure of the Russian Federation, as well as the list of indicators of criteria for the significance of objects of the critical Information infrastructure of the Russian Federation and their values».
19. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 166 dated 30.03.2022 «On measures to ensure the technological independence and security of the critical Information Infrastructure of the Russian Federation».
20. Organization of protection of objects of critical information infrastructure: a practical guide / ASISO.mailto:akar.1998@yandex.ru.
Review
For citations:
Khabarov V.I., Kravtsov A.Ya. Management limitations of closed architectures of automated process control systems in the digital transformation of industrial enterprises operating critical information infrastructure. Entrepreneur’s Guide. 2026;19(3):38-51. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24182/2073-9885-2026-19-3-38-51
JATS XML



























