Preview

Entrepreneur’s Guide

Advanced search

Flexible, classic and hybrid project management methodologies: advantages and disadvantages

https://doi.org/10.24182/2073-9885-2023-16-2-70-78

Abstract

The purpose of the work. Nowadays, competition in the market is increasing, which requires organizations to ensure advanced positions for survival. As practice shows, project management method is one of the most demanded and effective management methods. This study aims to examine the efficacy of flexible project management methodologies by contrasting them with conventional methodologies and evaluating the feasibility of integrating them into a hybrid methodology.

Methods and Materials: The complex, systemic and comparative approaches are the methodological basis of the study and are mainly based on methods of analysis and systematization.

Results: The article describes the analysis of the most demanding flexible project management methods. Each method has its own characteristics and specific criteria for comparison. Moreover, a comparison between flexible and traditional project management approaches was carried out, and the concept of method hybridization was introduced to integrate diverse methodologies at distinct phases of the project.

Conclusion: The choice of project management methodology depends on many conditions, such as the complexity of the task, the presence of an experienced team and methodology of its work, the established interaction with the customer, and many other details. Each of them shows its effectiveness under different conditions. Using a hybrid methodology that combines the advantages of different methods allows them to be applied in practice in project management.

About the Authors

R. K. Nigmatullin
Synergy University
Russian Federation

postgraduate student, Faculty of Management

Moscow



A. G. Dmitriev
Synergy University
Russian Federation

Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Assoc. Prof., Head of the Department of Organizational Management

Moscow



References

1. Andreeva R.N., Sinyayeva O.Yu. SCRUM: FLEXIBILITY IN A RIGID FRAMEWORK. Vestnik Universiteta. 2018; (2): pp. 13–20 URL: https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2018-2-13-20. (Accessed: January 16, 2023).

2. Mustafaeva, E.M. (2015). Associative method in diagnosing the subordinates’ perceptions of the management styles of British and Russian managers. Russian Psychological Journal, 12(4), pp. 193–202. URL: https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2015.4.16 (Accessed: January 16, 2023).

3. Gulyuk N.V. Principles of Successful Project Management. Business Education in the Knowledge Economy. 2017. № 2 (7), pp. 36–49. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29094112 (Accessed: January 14, 2023).

4. Dolzhenko R.A. The Essence and Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Use of Optimization Technologies «Line» and «Six Sigma». Bulletin of OmSTU. Series: Economics. 2014. № 1, pp. 25–34 URL: https://publications.hse.ru/articles/135702203 (Accessed: January 20, 2023).

5. Zarubina A.A. Project Management: Application of the Scrum Method in Marketing Projects. Business Education in the Knowledge Economy. 2017. № 3 (8), pp. 48–50. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30311188 (Accessed: January 18, 2023).

6. Melyakova, E.V. Modern Approaches to Managing Network and Virtual Organizations. in: Problems of Modern Economics. 2015. № 4(56). Pp. 121–123. PSE. 2015. № 4 (56). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25523170 (Accessed: February 02, 2023).

7. Plotnikov A.N., Plotnikov D.A. Current Problems of Project Management. Izv. Sarat. un-ta. New series. Series: Economics. Management. Law. 2014. Vol. 14, Iss. 1. Pp. 152–158. URL: https://doi.org/10.18500/1994-2540-2014-14-1-2-152-158 (Accessed: January 17, 2023).

8. Sabadash F.A., Tolmachev O.M., Zapuskalov N.M. Modernization of Machine-Building Enterprises Based on Kanban and Just-in-Time Logistic Systems. Bulletin of Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University. 2016. № 1, pp. 130–136. URL: http://www.vestnik.magtu.ru/soderzhanie-1-2016/50-arkhiv-nomerov/1-2016-g/637-sabadash-f-a-tolmachev-o-m-zapuskalov-n-m-modernizatsiya-mashinostroitelnykh-predpriyatij-na-osnove-logisticheskikh-sistem-kanban-i-just-in-time.html (Accessed: March 17, 2023).

9. Smolyakova N.V. Commercial Bank Business Process Management Based on Lean Concept. Universum: Economics and Law. 2015. № 1 (12). URL: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:scn:032054:15748272 (Accessed: February 15, 2023).

10. Terekhova A.E., Verba N.Yu. Problems of Managing Large and Complex Projects. Bulletin of GUU. 2013. № 2, pp. 161–165 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18936970 (Accessed: January 20, 2023).

11. Teybekin A.V. Evolution of Project Management Methods: World Experience and Development Prospects. Russian Entrepreneurship. 2017. Volume 18. № 24. P. 3969–3994. URL:10.18334/rp.18.24.38679 (Accessed: February 02, 2023).

12. Tkachenko I.N., Sivokoz K.K. The Use of Agile and Scrum Flexible Technologies for Managing Project Stakeholders. Upravlenets. 2017. № 4(68). pp. 85–95. URL: https://upravlenets.usue.ru/-2018/427 (Accessed: January 15, 2023).

13. Trofimova N.N. Features and Prospects of Implementing the Integrated Lean Six Sigma Methodology in an Enterprise. Vestnik Universiteta. 2021; (4):123–129. URL: https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2021-4-123–129 (Accessed: January 16, 2023).

14. Falko S.G. Traditional, Flexible and Hybrid Models and Standards of Project Management. Management of Scientific and Technical Projects: Proceedings of the Second International Scientific and Technical Conference, Moscow, April 6, 2018. Bauman MSTU. – Moscow, 2018. Pp. 258–261 (Accessed: January 27, 2023).

15. Yatsenko V.V. Competencies of the Team and Project Managers. Innovations in Management. 2018. № 2 (16). Pp. 72–79 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35214938 (Accessed: December 28, 2022).

16. Top-7 project management methods: Agile, Scrum, Kanban, PRINCE2 and others [Electronic resource] URL: https://www.pmservices.ru/project-management-news/top-7-metodov-upravleniya-proektami-agile-scrum-kanban-prince2-i-drugie/ (Accessed: December 28, 2022).

17. Dr Jeff Sutherland «Scrum: A Revolutionary Approach to Building Teams, Beating Deadlines and Boosting Productivity». Random House. 2014. 209 p.

18. Epler Igor J., Bozickovic Ranko C., Arsic Slavisa N., Dinic Jelena B. Real improvement processes in the Army based on the Lean Six Sigma concept. Vojnoteh. glas. 2016. № 4. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314484633_Real_improvement_processes_in_the_army_based_on_the_lean_six_sigma_concept (Accessed: March 17, 2023).

19. S. Bushuyev, D. Bushuyev, S. Neizvestny, Convergence and hybridization of project management methodologies Scientific Journal of Astana IT University ISSN (P): 2707-9031, ISSN (E): 2707-904X, URL: https://elibrary.ru/jwjzvz (Accessed: January 27, 2023).


Review

For citations:


Nigmatullin R.K., Dmitriev A.G. Flexible, classic and hybrid project management methodologies: advantages and disadvantages. Entrepreneur’s Guide. 2023;16(2):70–78. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24182/2073-9885-2023-16-2-70-78

Views: 2387

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-9885 (Print)
ISSN 2687-136X (Online)