Information support of public administration in the field of the knowledge economy and post
https://doi.org/10.24182/2073-9885-2021-14-2-107-122
Abstract
The issue of information support for public administration has always been very acute and, obviously, will never leave the category of topical. By solving it, active integration of advanced scientific and technological achievements into the provision of the process of state administration has been and continues to be. Several upheavals have taken place along the way, the largest of which have been the emergence of wired radio telephony and computerization. Today, such a revolution is digitalization, under the sign of which the post– industrial society exists today and the knowledge economy is being formed.
In such conditions, it seems appropriate to consider the problem put forward in the title of this article and specifically characterize the post–industrial society and the knowledge economy in the system of modern economic discourse, consider public administration as a mechanism and an economic problem, and analyze the information support of public administration of the knowledge economy.
About the Author
V. V. Nikishin
Southwest State University (SWSU);
Autonomous non–commercial organization «Dialog»
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Postgraduate student;
Head of social communications department
Moscow
References
1. Vigasin A.A. Uchenie ob upravlenii i gosudarstvennykh dokhodakh v «Artkhashastre». Vsemirnaya istoriya ekonomicheskoi mysli: V 6 tomakh / Gl. red. V. N. Cherkovets. T. I. Ot zarozhdeniya ekonomicheskoi mysli do pervykh teoreticheskikh sistem politicheskoi zhizni. — M.: Mysl’, 1987. 606 s. S. 83–93.
2. Volkov A.M. Ot gosudarstvennogo upravleniya k publichnomu administrirovaniyu. Nauchnaya set’ Sovremennoe pravo. 2017. URL: https://www.sovremennoepravo.ru/m/news/view/Ot-gosudarstvennogo-upravleniya-k-publichnomu-administrirovaniyu (Data obrashcheniya 01.12.2020).
3. Gogolev A.M. Nekotorye tendentsii i zakonomernosti stanovleniya i razvitiya gosudarstvennogo administrirovaniya.Administrativnoe pravo i protsess, 2018, 2. S. 19–25.
4. Inozemtsev V.L. Sovremennoe postindustrial’noe obshchestvo: priroda, protivorechiya, perspektivy. – M.: Logos, 2000. 304 s.
5. Rimskii V.L. Postindustrial’noe obshchestvo i sotsial’nyi kapital v sovremennoi Rossii. Problemnyi analiz i gosudarstvenno-upravlencheskoe proektirovanie. 2009. T. 2. № 5. S. 26–37.
6. Sotsiologicheskii entsiklopedicheskii slovar’ / Red. G.V. Osipov. – M.: NORMA, 2000. 488 s. S. 10.
7. Admininstratio. Merriam-Webster online dictionary. Url: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/administration (Дата доступа: 01.12.2020).
8. Banks, Alan and Jim Foster The Mystifications of Post-Industrialism // Appalachian Journal. 1983. 10. 4, pp. 372–378.
9. Barnes, T. et al. Vancouver: Restructuring narratives in the transnational metropolis / Canadian urban regions: trajectories of growth and change. Eds. L Bourne et al. Toronto, 2011, pp. 291–327.
10. Barrero Rodriguez, Concepcion, Escribano Collado, Pedro, Lopez Menudo, Francisco. Lecciones de Derecho administrativo. Parte general. Vol. 1. Madrid: Techos. 2014. 336 р., р. 37.
11. Bell, Daniel. The Coming of Post-Industrial Society. New York: Harper Colophon Books, 1974. 507 pp.
12. Czarnitzki, Dirk; Hall Bronwyn H. (Berkeley); Oriani Raffaele; The Market Valuation of Knowledge Assets in US and European Firms. URL: https://eml.berkeley.edu//~bhhall/papers/CHO05_mktval (Дата доступа: 02.12.2020).
13. Dunham-Jones, Ellen New Urbanism as a Counter-Project to Post-Industrialism. Places. 13. 2. 2000. pp: 26–31.
14. Forsthoff Ernst Rechtsfragen der leistenden Verwaltung. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer. 1959. 63 р.
15. Golden, Miriam & Michael Wallerstein Domestic and International Causes for the Rise of Pay Inequality: Post-Industrialism, Globalization, and Labor Market Institutions. The Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, UCLA. 2006. URL: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4rv06108 (Дата доступа: 02.12.2020).
16. Holmes, Douglas E-Gov: E-Business Strategies for Government. London: Nicholas Brealey Publishers. 2001. 320 р.
17. Illich I. Tools For Conviviality. CHOICE: Current Reviews for Academic Libraries. 10. November 1973. p. 1422.
18. Krahn, Harvey J.; Lowe, Graham S.; Hughes, Karen D. Work, Industry, and Canadian Society (6th ed.). Toronto, ON: Nelson Education. 2008, pp. 26–27.
19. Scitovsky, Tibor Papers on welfare and growth. Stanford un. Press. 1964. 274 p.
20. Targ, Harry R. Global Dominance and Dependence, Post-Industrialism, and International Relations Theory: A Review. International Studies Quarterly. 20. 3 (1976): 461–482.
21. The good, the bad and the inevitable. The pros and cons of e-government. Special report. The Economist, Feb. 16 2008.
22. Touraine, A. La sociйtй post-industrielle. Paris: Seuil. 1969. 319 pp.
23. Wolff, Hans J., Bachof, Otto, Stober, Rolf. Direito Administrativo. Vol. 1. Lisboa: Fundacao Calauste Gulbenkian. 2006. 707 р. P. 49–50.
Review
For citations:
Nikishin V.V.
Information support of public administration in the field of the knowledge economy and post
Views:
401
Email this article 