Features of the formation of a system of ESG–indicators of non–financial reporting to assess the business activity and trustworthiness of counterparties
https://doi.org/10.24182/2073-9885-2023-16-3-63-69
Abstract
At present, the tasks of the «green» economy, social planning and corporate governance are of particular importance. In Russia, the concept of ESG (environment, social, governance) is at the initial stage of its development, gradually being introduced into the financial and economic activities of an economic entity. Most foreign companies, in an effort to increase or maintain a high level of business reputation, already include ESG indicators in their reports.
In this regard, the purpose of this article is to study the problems associated with the formation of effective partnerships, the planning and implementation of which should be based on the use of a whole range of criteria: a positive credit history, a company’s rating in the industry, business reputation, as well as non–financial indicators that make up ESG — the concept of company development.
The purpose of the study was to identify key factors on the basis of which the reliability of counterparties should be determined, a single concept should be formed in establishing criteria for assessing the integrity of counterparties, and preventing possible business risks. The importance and relevance of the study are determined by the fact that it was carried out as part of the implementation of new regulations to introduce the concept of a «technical company», assess the reliability of counterparties, and lay responsibility on companies for interacting with unscrupulous subjects of market relations.
About the Author
N. A. LazarevaRussian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Ass. Prof.,
Ass. Prof. of the Department, Department of Accounting and Audit
St. Petersburg
References
1. Savelyeva I.P. Assessment of the impact of management decisions on the results of the economic activities of small construction enterprises. Problems of the modern economy, No. 1 (25), 2008. URL: http://www.m-economy.ru (accessed date 08.05.2023).
2. Gorovtsova M. 10 ways to check the counterparty: the necessary documents and useful services. URL: https://www.garant.ru/article/511892/?ysclid=l7ri0ffkbd702284139 (accessed date 10.05.2023).
3. Business Reputation Rating / Alfa-Bank, 2022. URL: https://club.alfabank.ru/company/2524729/blog/4212/?ysclid=l8u0rhmiph 595021666 (date of appeal 10.05.2023).
4. Certification center of Altair M organizations. Access mode: https://reestrrating.ru/?ysclid=l91st8724x55560880. Date of appeal 09.05.2023
5. Beerbaum Dirk, L w Edgar, Thorsten Illig-Martin. Towards Integrated Reporting in Europe - An analysis of 40 annual corporate reports regarding their value creation disclosures. Project: Integrated Reporting: An analysis of 40 annual corporate reports by European IR reporters regarding their value creation disclosure. May, 2018. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21102.51527.
6. Rich I.N. Research on the practice of using integrated thinking in the formation of corporate reporting. Intelligence. Innovation. Investments. 2022. No 4. C. 10–25, https://doi.org/10.25198/2077-7175-2022-4-10 [accessed May 06 2023].
7. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation dated 05.05.2017 No. 876r «On approval of the concept for the development of public nonfinancial reporting and the plan of measures for its implementation».
8. I.D. Nurova Financial and Non-Financial Reporting: Information Boundaries. Modern Scientific Research and Innovation. 2019. No. 12 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://web.snauka.ru/issues/2019/12/90998 (accessed date: 09.05.2023).
9. Janine Guillot, Charles Tilley. Integrated thinking: a 21st century solution. https://www.integratedreporting.org/wp-content/uploads/2021 /06/Integrated-thinking-virtuous-loop.pdf [accessed May 06 2023].
10. Investors support integrated reporting as a route to better understanding of performance. https://www.integratedreporting.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Investor-statement-2020.pdf [accessed May 06 2023].
Review
For citations:
Lazareva N.A. Features of the formation of a system of ESG–indicators of non–financial reporting to assess the business activity and trustworthiness of counterparties. Entrepreneur’s Guide. 2023;16(3):63-69. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24182/2073-9885-2023-16-3-63-69