How Entrepreneurial University Model is changing the Indian COVID–19 Fight?
https://doi.org/10.24182/2073-9885-2021-14-3-153-162
- Р Р‡.МессенРТвЂВВВВВВВВжер
- РћРТвЂВВВВВВВВнокласснРСвЂВВВВВВВВРєРСвЂВВВВВВВВ
- LiveJournal
- Telegram
- ВКонтакте
- РЎРєРѕРїРСвЂВВВВВВВВровать ссылку
Полный текст:
Аннотация
It is indeed a great misnomer to analyze the dimensions of academic capitalism with the steady rise of entrepreneurial university in lines with Western educational policies. It is indeed a long treaded journey in emerging underdeveloped economies which has given the notion of a dream of the next superpower wherein entrepreneurial universities are a very recent concept post liberalization of economy and change in governmental practices and loosing hold over bureaucratic affairs which has led more stronger the innovation landscape of industry–education–government nexus in building the nation. Recent years have seen the great crisis of COVID pandemic which has changed the ideologies and theoretical models underlying economic welfare states and the velocity of money running through society. Amidst huge literature in entrepreneurial university studies, very little work has been done which answers the very pertinent question and research gap of how the triple helix model arrived in India and how the central government in India changed its beliefs globally by inheriting such model in its innovation practices to champion the cause of bringing new products, economic welfare, product development; which transformed India’s idea of being an importer of healthcare facilities to an expert and exporter of medical facilities thus completely reversing the cycle of trade and global logistics in healthcare economic practices. This paper works on such exploratory case study concerning India’s success story in employing triple helix model of innovation in national policy practices and world economy.
Ключевые слова
Об авторах
Samrat Ray
Peter the Great Saint Petersburg Polytechnic University
Россия
Россия
Research Fellow
Saint Petersburg
Dossou Yedehou Leandre
Peter the Great Saint Petersburg Polytechnic University
Россия
Россия
Saint Petersburg
Список литературы
1. Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The Triple Helix: university - industry - government relations. A laboratory for knowledge based economic development. EASST Review. European Society for the Study of Science and Technology, 14(1): 18-36.
2. Agrawal, A., (2001) University-to-industry knowledge transfer: literature review and unanswered questions. International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 3, Issue 4, pp. 286-300.
3. Verencia Winona Janice, Melia Famiola, (2018) «Perceived Risks in Entrepreneurial Process among Culinary SMEs». International Journal of Management and Applied Science (IJMAS) , pp. 21-27, Volume-4,Issue-11
4. Clark, B.R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities. Oxford: Pergamon.
5. Altbach, P.G. (2005). Globalization and the University: Myths and Realities in an Unequal World. EPI, 2005. Global Higher Education Rankings. Affordability and Accessibility in Comparative Perspective. Washington: EPI, www.educationalpolicy.org.
6. Audretsch, D. B., Lehmann, E., & Warning, S. (2005). University spillovers and new firm location. Research Policy, 34(7), 110-1112.
7. Audretsch, D. (2007). The entrepreneurial society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Stake, R.E. (1995). The art of case study research. SAGE Publications.
9. Kirby, D.A. (2004) Entrepreneurship education: Can business schools meet the challenge?, Accessed 10 December 2020 at http://labsel.pesarosviluppo.it/docindexer/Uploads\178-Entrepreneurship education_Can business meet the challange.pdf.
10. Etzkowitz, H., (2004). The evolution of the entrepreneurial university. Int. J. Technology and Globalization, Vol. 1, No.1, pp. 64-77.
11. Henry Etzkowitz, Loet Leydesdorff, The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and «Mode 2» to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations, Research Policy, Volume 29, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 109-123,ISSN https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4.
12. Drucker, Peter F., Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Practice and Principles (1985). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign’s Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract-1496169.
13. Middlehurst, R. (2004). Changing internal governance: A discussion of leadership roles and management structures in UK universities. Higher Education Quarterly, 58(4), 258-279.
14. Krueger, N. (2009). Entrepreneurial intentions are dead: Long live entrepreneurial intentions. In A. L. Carsrud & M. Brannback (eds.). Understanding the entrepreneurial mind, international studies in entrepreneurship (pp. 51-72), New York: Springer.
15. Bo Carlsson & Zolt n J. cs & David B. Audretsch & Pontus Braunerhjelm, 2015. «Knowledge creation, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: a historical review», Chapters, in: Global Entrepreneurship, Institutions and Incentives, chapter 5, pages 71-107, Edward Elgar Publishing.
16. Sampath, P.G., & Ayitey, D. (2016). External opportunities, innovation and industrial growth: The case of GVCs in Africa. In: Sampath P.G., Oyelaran-Oyeyinka B. (Eds.), Sustainable industrialization in Africa. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
17. Shenoy, M. (2016). Industrial ecology in developing countries. In R. Clift & A. Druckman (Eds.), Taking stock of industrial ecology (pp. 229-245). Switzerland: Springer Cham.
18. Quartey, S.H., Oguntoye, O. Understanding and Promoting Industrial Sustainability in Africa Through the Triple Helix Approach: a Conceptual Model and Research Propositions. J Knowl Econ (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-020-00660-2.
19. Etzkowitz, H. (2003) Research groups as «quasi-firms»: the invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research Policy 32, pp. 110-121.
20. «Can the Subaltern Speak?» In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, ed. Cary Nelson and Lawrence Grossberg. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1988, 271-313.
21. Samrat Ray et al. «IMPACT OF INNOVATION ON ECONOMIC GROWTH: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE ECONOMIC COMMUNITY OF WEST AFRICAN STATES AND INDIA. International Research Journal. № 6 (96) Part 4, (2020): 53. Tue. 23. Jun. 2020.
22. Samrat Ray. How COVID-19 changed dimensions of human suffering and poverty alleviation: economic analysis of humanitarian logistics. Vestnik of Astrakhan State Technical University. Series: Economics. 2020; 4: 98-104. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24143/2073-5537-2020-4-98-104.
23. Galvao, A., Mascarenhas, C., Marques, C., Ferreira, J. and Ratten, V. (2019). «Triple helix and its evolution: a systematic literature review». Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 812-833. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-10-2018-0103.
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Ray S., Leandre D.Ye. How Entrepreneurial University Model is changing the Indian COVID–19 Fight? Путеводитель предпринимателя. 2021;14(3):153-162. https://doi.org/10.24182/2073-9885-2021-14-3-153-162
For citation:
Ray S., Leandre D.Ye. How Entrepreneurial University Model is changing the Indian COVID–19 Fight? Entrepreneur’s Guide. 2021;14(3):153-162. https://doi.org/10.24182/2073-9885-2021-14-3-153-162
Просмотров:
774
ISSN 2073-9885 (Print)
ISSN 2687-136X (Online)
ISSN 2687-136X (Online)
Послать статью по эл. почте 