Model for assessing the impact of industrial crisis on the regional economy
https://doi.org/10.24182/2073-9885-2021-14-3-93-105
Abstract
The results of the analysis of the financial and economic condition of organizations of various types of economic activity are presented. A cognitive economic and mathematical model for assessing the impact of crisis phenomena in industry on the regional economy is proposed. The use of this model will increase the validity of anti–crisis management strategies in industry.
Keywords
crisis phenomena in industry,
regional economy,
anti–crisis management,
cognitive economic and mathematical model of the region,
bankruptcy
Supporting agencies: The reported study was funded by RFBR according to the research project № 19–410–670009 р_а.
About the Authors
M. I. Dli
Department of Information Technology in Economics and Management, National Research University «MPEI», Smolensk branch
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Tech.), Prof.
Smolensk
T. V. Kakatunova
National Research University «MPEI», Smolensk branch
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Prof.
Smolensk
References
1. Federal’naya sluzhba gosudarstvennoi statistiki [Elektronnyi resurs]: URL: https://www.gks.ru/.
2. Edinyi federal’nyi reestr yuridicheski znachimykh svedenii o faktakh deyatel’nosti yuridicheskikh lits, individual’nykh predprinimatelei i inykh sub’ektov ekonomicheskoi deyatel’nosti [Elektronnyi resurs]/ URL: https://fedresurs.ru/news/25463799-3379-416d-b52f-3ab04335359e.
3. Astakhov V.V., Khabarov V.I. Opredelenie effektivnoi strategii povysheniya konkurentosposobnosti naukoemkogo predpriyatiya. Sovremennaya konkurentsiya. 2019. T. 13. № 2(74). S. 120–129.
4. Kurnysheva I.R. Konkurentnyi faktor strukturnoi modernizatsii rossiiskoi ekonomiki. Sovremennaya konkurentsiya. 2019. T.13. № 3. S. 16–25.
5. Orekhova S.V. Resursnaya strategiya firmy: investitsionnye modeli i rossiiskaya spetsifika. Sovremennaya konkurentsiya. 2016. T.11. № 3. S. 65–76.
6. Gavrilova T.A., Kubel’skii M.V., Kudryavtsev D.V., Grinberg E.Ya. Tipologizatsiya i sistematizatsiya podkhodov k razrabotke strategii kompanii: modeli i metody iz smezhnykh nauk. Prikladnaya informatika. 2020. T. 15. № 3 (87). S. 99–118.
7. Vlasov D.S. Mezhstranovoe sravnenie investitsionnoi konkurentosposobnosti promyshlennykh predpriyatii. Sovremennaya konkurentsiya. 2016. T.10. № 1(55). S. 54–66.
8. Palei T.F. Infrastrukturnye i institutsional’nye instrumenty politiki povysheniya natsional’noi konkurentosposobnosti. Sovremennaya konkurentsiya. 2017. T.17. № 5(65). S. 103–113.
9. Konsul’tantPlyus. [Elektronnyi resurs]. – URL:http://www.consultant.ru/law/hotdocs/69063.html/.
10. Bulygina O.V., Emel’yanov A.A., Selyavskii Yu.V. Instrumental’naya podderzhka prinyatiya reshenii v upravlenii mul’tiproektami po vypusku metalloproduktsii. Сhast’ 1. Prikladnaya informatika. 2019. T. 14. № 3(81). S. 74–90.
11. Chernovalova M.V. Nechetkie pretsedentnye modeli dlya upravleniya proektami s ispol’zovaniem mul’tiontologicheskogo podkhoda. Prikladnaya informatika. 2021. T. 16. № 2 (92). S. 4–16.
12. Vygodchikova I.Yu. Instrumentarii prinyatiya reshenii ob investirovanii krupnykh rossiiskikh kompanii s ispol’zovaniem ierarkhicheskoi protsedury ranzhirovaniya i minimaksnogo podkhoda. Prikladnaya informatika. 2019. T. 14. № 6 (84). S. 123–137.
13. Bulygina O.V., Emel’yanov A.A., Yashin E.S. Ne-faktory, temporal’naya logika i nechetko-logicheskie instrumenty v gibridnykh modelyakh upravleniya riskami importozameshcheniya. Prikladnaya informatika. 2020. T. 15. № 4 (88). S. 5–43.
Review
For citations:
Dli M.I., Kakatunova T.V. Model for assessing the impact of industrial crisis on the regional economy. Entrepreneur’s Guide. 2021;14(3):93-105. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24182/2073-9885-2021-14-3-93-105
Views:
407
Email this article 